Fix OTP Rate Limit (429) Errors
How to diagnose and fix HTTP 429 rate-limit errors on OTP APIs. Per-phone vs per-IP limits, exponential backoff, idempotency, and capacity planning for spikes.
StartMessaging Team
Engineering
429 means the OTP API has throttled your request. Honest diagnosis first — is it your code looping, or a real spike?
What 429 Means
Server is rejecting because your client exceeded a rate limit. The limit could be on your account, on the destination phone, or on the upstream operator route.
Where the Limit is Hit
- Per-account TPS — you exceeded the account-wide limit.
- Per-phone — the same phone got too many OTPs in the window.
- Per-IP — pumping defence.
- Carrier upstream — operator capping your sender ID.
Exponential Backoff
async function withBackoff<T>(fn: () => Promise<T>, max = 3): Promise<T> {
for (let i = 0; i < max; i++) {
try { return await fn(); }
catch (e: any) {
if (e.status !== 429 || i === max - 1) throw e;
await new Promise(r => setTimeout(r, (2 ** i) * 1000 + Math.random() * 1000));
}
}
throw new Error('unreachable');
}Capacity Planning
See our rate-limiting guide. For sale-day spikes pre-warn your provider.
Monitoring
- Track 429 count per minute.
- Alert when 429s exceed 1% of OTP traffic.
- Surface to user as “please wait 30 seconds”, not a generic error.
FAQ
StartMessaging exposes per-phone and per-account limits clearly in the dashboard.
Related Articles
Learn proven rate limiting strategies for OTP APIs: per-phone, per-IP, and sliding window approaches to prevent SMS pumping and brute force attacks.
How attackers exploit OTP send endpoints with bots and SMS traffic pumping schemes — and the rate limits, fingerprinting, and routing controls that stop them.
Learn what idempotency keys are, why they matter for OTP APIs, and how to implement them correctly to prevent duplicate SMS charges and improve reliability.
Ready to Send OTPs?
Integrate StartMessaging in 5 minutes. No DLT registration required.